DEBUG: PAGE=domain, TITLE=View all Vendors,ID=1466,TEMPLATE=vendors
toggle expanded view
VENDORID = -1
VENDOR =
VENDORparam =
Title = View all Vendors
Description =

Search across all vendors:

Capgemini - Quality Engineering 2023

Vendor Analysis

by Dominique Raviart

published on Jun 01, 2023

Access to this report is restricted to logged in clients with access. Login to get full access

Report Overview:

This NelsonHall vendor assessment analyzes Capgemini’s offerings and capabilities in quality engineering services

Who is this Report for:

NelsonHall’s QE profile on Capgemini is a comprehensive assessment of Capgemini’s offerings and capabilities designed for:

  • Sourcing managers monitoring the capabilities of existing suppliers of QE and identifying vendor suitability for quality engineering/QA/testing services
  • Vendor marketing, sales, and business managers looking to benchmark themselves against their peers
  • Financial analysts and investors specializing in the QE and IT services sectors.

Scope of this Report:

The report provides a comprehensive and objective analysis of Capgemini’s QE offerings, capabilities, and market and financial strengths, including:

  • Identification of the company’s strategy, emphasis, and new developments
  • Analysis of the company’s strengths, challenges, and outlook
  • Revenue estimates
  • Analysis of the company’s offerings and key service components
  • Analysis of the company’s delivery organization, including the location of delivery centers.

Key Findings & Highlights:

Capgemini markets its services under the Quality Engineering & Testing (QE&T) brand. QE&T is a global service line (GSL) across (predominantly) geography-based strategic business units (SBUs). Examples of other GSLs include Capgemini Engineering, based on the former Altran, iGATE, and Sogeti High-Tech.

The SBUs are the Americas, APAC, North Europe, South Europe, and Financial Services (including banking, capital markets, insurance, and healthcare). They have responsibility for go-to-market, bids, and delivery. The company believes this organizational approach helps it to react quickly to changing project requirements. Capgemini also highlights that, with this distributed structure, SBUs are better positioned to conduct personnel reskilling locally than a more centralized structure would have enabled. Within SBUs, testing practices have full P&L responsibility.

Given Capgemini’s service portfolio and IP investments, we anticipate this report will be of interest to a wide variety of buyers looking for a provider of QE services.

Login to get full access:

close